Something big was missing from Goldcorp and Tahoe Resources' shareholder meetings: the voices of communities impacted by their mines

On April 30th and May 8th respectively, Goldcorp and Tahoe Resources held their Annual General Meetings (AGM) in Canada to discuss their FY2014 accomplishments and future expansion plans at their mine sites in Guatemala.

What was missing, however, were the many voices of those impacted by Goldcorp and Tahoe's operations around the world - voices of communities whose water sources are becoming increasingly contaminated and drying up; voices of community leaders who are being criminalized for speaking out against the mining companies, and the voices of peaceful Guatemalans who are witnessing the military occupy their communities once more in order to protect private corporate interests.

Members of the Maritimes-Guatemala Breaking the Silence
Network (BTS), the Mining Injustice Solidarity Network (MISN)
and other allies demonstrate in front of Goldcorp's office.
Photo credit: NISGUA

Organizers, activists and others in solidarity with mining-impacted communities gathered on April 30th outside Goldcorp's Toronto office to commemorate the life of 16-year-old Topacio Reynoso. Topacio was the Youth Coordinator of the Resistance in Mataquescuintla, near the Escobal mine, and was shot and killed in April 2014. Although the Escobal mine is owned by Tahoe Resources, Goldcorp retains a 29% controlling share in the company. 

"Rest in Power, Topacio!" Photo credit: NISGUA

Those present laid red carnations on the steps of Goldcorp's office in an act of solidarity with Topacio's family and friends as well as with communities who continue to face violence from mining operations. The flowers also symbolize the ongoing resistance to the Escobal project. In 2011, communities from San Rafael las Flores - which borders the Escobal mine - marched to the company's headquarters in Guatemala City and to the Canadian embassy to leave red carnations in an act of protest against the mining project.

Photo credit: NISGUA

Activists marched down Toronto's financial district to Goldcorp's shareholder AGM, carrying banners to denounce the violence suffered around the Marlin mine during its ten years of operation in Guatemala.

Photo credit: NISGUA

Photo credit: NISGUA

Community voices aren't being heard where the decisions are being made, and so demonstrators wheat-pasted some of the messages impacted communities wanted to tell investors outside Goldcorp's office and around Toronto's financial district.

Photo credit: Sarita Galvez

In a similar action on May 8th, members of the Mining Justice Alliance and Amnesty International gathered to bring some of these same messages to Tahoe Resources' shareholder AGM in Vancouver, Canada.

U.S. and Canadian-owned mining companies like Tahoe Resources and Goldcorp operate without the free, prior and informed consent of those most impacted by their operations. Instead of listening to the concerns of community members, these companies engage in practices of criminalization of local leaders, while promoting the implementation of militarized security strategies at their mine sites in an attempt to quell local opposition. 

Despite this violence, communities continue to stand up and say: "We're still here. We're still in resistance." 

To see more messages from those impacted by Tahoe's Escobal mine, click here. 

Tahoe Resources’ former security manager to be tried in Guatemalan court

Source: Center for Environmental, Social and Legal Action (CALAS) - MiningWatch Canada - Network in Solidarity with the People of Guatemala (NISGUA)

(Guatemala City/Ottawa) On Wednesday, a Guatemalan judge decided that Tahoe’s former security manager, Alberto Rotondo, should stand trial for his role in a shooting attack on peaceful protesters in April of last year.

On April 27, 2013, Tahoe Resources’ private security opened fire on peaceful protesters outside the Escobal mine, the company’s only project, in the municipality of San Rafael Las Flores in southeastern Guatemala. Rotondo, Tahoe’s then head of security and an ex-military officer from Peru, was arrested at Guatemala’s international airport and charged with allegedly having ordered the attack.

Alberto Rotondo to stand trial

Yesterday, the judge ruled that Rotondo should stand trial on charges of causing serious and minor bodily harm to four of the seven men injured in the attack, as well as for obstruction of justice. If convicted, Rotondo could face up to 28 years in prison. The evidentiary hearing is scheduled for February 3, 2015.

“This decision sets an important precedent to the extent that it will allow the Public Prosecutor and the victims to demonstrate the premeditated and aggressive way in which Rotondo orchestrated the attack, as well as the responsibility of Guatemalan authorities in its planning and execution,” explained Rafael Maldonado, Director of the Center for Environmental, Social and Legal Action (CALAS).

Tahoe Resources’ Escobal silver project is the subject of broad local opposition and ongoing legal processes in Guatemala and Canada. In June 2014, the seven victims of the attack filed a civil suit in British Columbia against the company for its role in the April 2013 violence. The first major hearing in this case is scheduled for April 2015 regarding Tahoe's argument that the case should be heard in Guatemala instead of Canada.

“What we want is justice. Even though we know that this is difficult to achieve in Guatemala, we are confident that we will have an opportunity to demonstrate that Mr. Rotondo and the company are guilty,” stated Artemio Castillo, a victim of the attack and a co-plaintiff in both cases.

Foreshadowing the obstacles ahead toward achieving justice in Guatemala, the judge granted Rotondo house arrest, rejecting two separate instances in which the Public Prosecutor accused the ex Tahoe employee with being in contempt of court.

Maldonado commented on this unexpected decision saying, “Despite the favorable decision to send Rotondo to trial, the judge demonstrated partiality in this case by rejecting multiple requests from the victims and the Public Prosecutor to keep Rotondo in detention.”

Tahoe Resources Inc. is a silver exploration and development company that lists on the Toronto and New York stock exchanges, with offices in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada and Reno, Nevada, USA. Goldcorp, a mining company with a lengthy history of human rights abuses at its Marlin Mine in northeastern Guatemala, holds 40% of Tahoe Resources shares and three seats on its board of directors.

For more information:
* Rafael Maldonado, Centre for Environmental and Social Legal Action (CALAS), rafamaldonado(at)calas.org.gt, (502) 5307-4250
* Jen Moore, MiningWatch Canada, jen(at)miningwatch.ca, (613) 569-3439
* Ellen Moore, Network in Solidarity with the People of Guatemala (NISGUA), ellen(at)nisgua.org, (502) 3027-7134

Photo credit to: Vea Canal/Panorama News

For more background, please visit tahoeontrial.net 

NISGUA has accompanied communities in opposition to the Tahoe Resources Escobal mine since 2011. 

Organizaciones internacionales exigen justicia ante ataque armado en contra de líderes comunitarios opuestos a la mina Escobal de Tahoe Resources

Merilyn Topacio Reynoso Pacheco, 1997 -2014 (Foto: Danilo Zuleta)

Han pasado dos semanas desde el ataque mortal contra Alex y Topacio Reynoso, lideres comunitarios de Mataquescuintla, Jalapa, quienes estuvieron oponiéndose activamente a la mina El Escobal de Tahoe Resources en el sureste de Guatemala. Murió Topacio, quien tenía solo 16 años, y fue gravemente herido su papa, quien sigue bajo cuidado intensivo en el hospital. NISGUA está en solidaridad con la familia Reynoso y los miles de familias más pidiendo el derecho a la libre determinación, quienes han sufrido una intensificación de violencia, represión y criminalización desde la llegada de la empresa minera Tahoe Resources, de capital estadounidense y canadiense. 

 

Miles de familiares, amigos y vecinos honraron a Topacio, 15 de abril en Mataquescuintla.
(Foto: latribunadelpatojo)

Estudiantes y amigos hicieron banderas para llevar durante la procesión funeraria. (Foto: latribunadelpatojo)

Hoy NISGUA, junta con 35 organizaciones internacionales más, entregó una carta abierta a las autoridades Guatemaltecas denunciando el ataque y pidiendo justicia. Versión en ingles aquí.

Dra. Claudia Paz y Paz Bailey

Fiscal General de la República de Guatemala

1 de mayo del 2014

Re: Ataque armado en contra de líderes comunitarios opuestos al proyecto minero de Tahoe Resources

Estimada Doctora Claudia Paz y Paz Bailey,

Las organizaciones abajo firmantes estamos muy preocupados ante las noticias del ataque del 13 de abril en contra de Edwin Alexander Reynoso y su hija de 16 años, Merilyn Topacio Reynoso Pacheco. Rechazamos este ataque violento y exigimos que el Ministerio Publico realice una investigación completa e imparcial para asegurar que los responsables sean juzgados. También pedimos que la investigación sea trasladado de la Fiscalía Distrital de Jalapa a la Fiscalía de Delitos Contra Defensores de Derechos Humanos.

Merilyn Topacio Reynoso fue asesinada en el ataque, y Alex Reynoso sigue bajo cuidado intensivo en el hospital después de sufrir cuatro heridas de bala en el pecho y el estómago. Padre e hija son activistas de la Resistencia Pacifica en Defensa de los Recursos Naturales de Mataquescuintla, Jalapa, lo cual se ha organizado en contra de la mina Escobal de Tahoe Resources, ubicada en San Rafael las Flores. Goldcorp mantiene 40% de las acciones de Tahoe Resources, la cual opera el proyecto Escobal a nivel local mediante su filial, Minera San Rafael.

La familia Reynoso ha estado al frente de la lucha regional por la defensa del derecho al consentimiento previo, libre e informado, la auto-determinación, y los derechos humanos, que se organizó ante la llegada de Tahoe Resources a los departamentos sureste de Jalapa y Santa Rosa en 2010. Topacio fue una lideresa del movimiento juvenil de Mataquescuintla en contra de la minería y una defensora de derechos humanos muy conocida y activa. Su padre, Alex Reynoso, es un líder comunitario muy reconocido por su trabajo en la consulta comunitaria y como representante de la Resistencia Pacifica en Defensa de los Recursos Naturales de Mataquescuintla.

En Noviembre 2012, la municipalidad de Mataquescuintla celebró la primera consulta municipal en el departamento de Jalapa, sumándose a otras tres municipalidades en Santa Rosa que han expresado un rotundo “no” a la minería en su territorio. En diciembre del 2013, la Corte de Constitucionalidad dictó en favor de la consulta en Mataquescuintla, reconociendo la responsabilidad de las autoridades municipales en convocar esas consultas y tomar decisiones según sus resultados, afirmando su valor como "medios adecuados para que los pueblos puedan ejercer su derecho a dar su opinión y ser consultados sobre temas de interés." Hasta la fecha, se han realizado 14 consultas comunitarias en los municipios, las ciudades y las aldeas alrededores del proyecto.

A seis kilómetros del proyecto Escobal, los residentes de Mataquescuintla siguen opuestos al proyecto de Tahoe. Pero, en vez de respeto para su derecho a la auto-determinación y a decir no a este proyecto, han sufridas varias actas de violencia, intimidación y represión:

• Desde 2011, han sido acusados, sin fundamento legal, más de 100 personas involucradas en la resistencia a la mina.
• Entre marzo y mayo del 2013, en dos ocasiones, la policía desalojó violentamente el campamento pacifico, legítimo y legal radicado fuera de la mina
• En abril del 2013, las fuerzas de seguridad privada de Tahoe atacaron seis manifestantes pacificas fuera de la mina; uno fue gravemente herido. El ex jefe de seguridad de Tahoe Resources, Alberto Rotondo, sigue bajo arresto domiciliario mientras se espere la apertura del juicio en su contra, por supuestamente haber ordenado el ataque, y por lesiones y la obstrucción de justicia.
• En mayo 2013, Presidente Otto Pérez Molina declaró un estado de sitio en cuatro municipalidades alrededor del proyecto de Tahoe, inclusive en Mataquescuintla.

Estamos muy preocupados por la violencia y la persecución en contra de los defensores de derechos humanos y líderes comunitarios quienes están opuestos a la mina de Tahoe. Está sumamente importante que el crimen que terminó en el asesinato de Topacio Reynoso y las lesiones de que ahora sufre Alex Reynoso no sigue en la impunidad. Exigimos una investigación completa e imparcial por la Fiscalía de Delitos Contra Defensores de Derechos Humanos para asegurar que haya justicia, y para prevenir más violencia en la región. También pedimos que la investigación sea trasladado de la Fiscalía Distrital de Jalapa a la Fiscalía de Delitos Contra Defensores de Derechos Humanos. Tenemos entendido que Alex Reynoso está recibiendo protección policíaca mientras se recupere del ataque. Exigimos que el Ministro de Gobernación siga trabajando en conjunto con el Procurador de Derechos Humanos para asegurar la seguridad de Alex Reynoso y de su familia.

Muchas de nuestras organizaciones han tenido enlaces y/o compromisos profundos por varios años con los grupos opuestos a la mina de Tahoe Resources, y recientemente, muchas de ellas han visitado a las comunidades afectadas para reunirse con líderes locales y defensores de derechos humanos. Reconocemos que este tipo de violencia, la cual ocurre con preocupante frecuencia en y alrededor de las minas que hay en Guatemala, es también un grave problema global. Muchas de las organizaciones abajo firmantes están actualmente participando en una campaña llamada “Abierta para la Justicia,” para exigir legislación que garantice el acceso a la justicia en las cortes canadienses para las personas afectados por las operaciones mineras internacionales de las empresas Canadienses.

Le agradecemos su atención a esta solicitud y esperamos su apreciada respuesta.

Organizaciones firmantes:

Atlantic Regional Solidarity Network (ARSN) – Canada

Café Justicia Ottawa Education in Action – Canadá

Center for Alternative Mining Development Policy, La Crosse, Wisconsin - USA

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) - USA

The Chicago Religious Leadership Network on Latin America  - USA

Comité pour les droits humains en Amérique latine (CDHAL) – Québec 

Conference of Major Superiors of Men – USA

Denver Justice & Peace Committee - USA

Environmental Network for Central America (ENCA) – United Kingdom

Guatemala Human Rights Commission (GHRC) – USA

Guatemala Partnership Committee, Congregational Church of Needham - USA

Guatemala Solidarity Network – United Kingdom

Guatemalan Working Group of the Ontario Public Interest Research Group (OPIRG), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario - Canada

Heart of the Sky Fair Trade - USA

Inter Pares – Canada

Justice, Peace & Integrity of Creation Office of the Sisters of Providence of St. Vincent de Paul - Kingston, Ontario - Canada

KAIROS: Canadian Ecumenical Justice Initiatives - Canada

Kickapoo Guatemala Accompaniment Project - USA

La Plataforma de Solidaridad con Chiapas y Guatemala de Madrid - Spain

Maquila Solidarity Network (MSN) – Canada

Maritimes-Guatemala Breaking the Silence Network – Canada

Mining Injustice Solidarity Network, Toronto, Ontario – Canada

Mining Justice Action Committee, Victoria, British Columbia – Canada

Mining Justice Alliance, Vancouver, Coast Salish Territories – Canada

MiningWatch Canada

Network in Solidarity with the People of Guatemala (NISGUA) - USA

New Hampshire-Vermont Guatemala Accompaniment Project (NH-VT G.A.P.) - USA

Oxfam America

Partners for Arlington and Guatemala, Arlington, VA - USA

The Peace and Justice Committee of First Churches, Northampton, MA - USA

Peace Watch Switzerland (PWS)

Projet Accompagnement Québec-Guatemala – Québec

SalvAide – Canada

Social Justice Connection – Québec

SOAW – LA - USA

SOA Watch - USA

St. Louis Inter-Faith Committee on Latin America - USA

University of Northern British Columbia (UNBC) Guatemala Research Group – Canada

cc:

Erick Archila Dehesa

Ministro del Ministerio de Energía y Minas

Ing. Fernando Castellanos

Director General de la Minería, Ministerio de Energía y Minas

Mauricio López Bonilla

Ministerio de Gobernación

Michelle Melisa Martínez Kelly

Ministra del Ministerio de Ambiente y Recursos Naturales

Embajada de los Estados Unidos en Guatemala

Deputy Political-Economic Counselor, William Ayala

Embajada de los Estados Unidos en Guatemala

Oficial de Asuntos Políticos, Norman Galimba 

Embajada de Canadá en Guatemala

Embajador Stuart Savage

Embajada de Canadá en Guatemala

Oficial de Asuntos Políticos Colleen Pigeon

Sipakapa is still not for sale...

Neither are San Rafael Las Flores, Nueva Santa Rosa, Mataquescuintla, Jalapa nor Santa Rosa de Lima.

In 2005, the communities of Sipakapa carried out one of the first community consultations on mining in Guatemala, taking a stand against Canadian giant, Goldcorp Inc., and sparking a movement that has resulted in over 70 referenda throughout the country to date.

Communities opposing mining in their territory warn of environmental destruction, poisoned water sources and community division. Goldcorp's Marlin mine, which began extracting gold in 2005, has soundly delivered on all three of the concerns outlined by affected communities, while Tahoe Resources' Escobal mine, which began commercial production a month ago, seems poised to follow suite.

In addition to expanding the Marlin mine to include extraction from underground tunnels, Goldcorp and Guatemalan subsidiary EntreMares, have initiated development of a new open pit project named Los Chocoyos in neighboring Sipakapa. The Los Chocoyos license was granted in 2006 and renewed twice before the Environmental Impact Assessment was approved in February 2013, giving the go ahead for exploitation at the mining site. While Goldcorp lauds the municipal government of Sipakapa for its support of mining, the company fails to recognize that public opinion is divided and widespread opposition exists.

In May 2013, the Maya Sipakapense Council and over one thousand supporters gathered in front of the municipality to express their opposition to the municipal government's proposal to repeat the 2005 community consultation, which voted against mineral exploitation in their territory. In June, thousands marched to celebrate the eighth anniversary of their consultation. In September, hundreds of protesters temporarily blocked the Inter-American Highway to demand an end to Goldcorp's Marlin operations. A month later, community members gathered again to call on the mayor to respond to concerns previously presented by communities and to put an end to the municipal government's stigmatization of community leaders opposing mining. 

Community members gather in the municipal hall to commemorate the 8th
anniversary of the community consultation in Sipakapa (Photo SaraGuate)

Communities opposed to Goldcorp's Los Chocoyos project
 march in Sipakapa (Photo SaraGuate)

In December, representatives from the Maya Sipakapense Council and the Western People's Council (CPO) presented a legal action against the Director of the Ministry of Energy and Mines for violation of the right to free, prior and informed consent as outlined in ILO Convention 169 regarding Indigenous Peoples and supported by a 2011 ruling in Guatemala's Constitutional Court. 

“The Maya Sipakapense People will not allow more abuse and displacement. It is for these reasons that on December 11, 2013, we presented a Constitutional complaint... in order to achieve, in a legal and peaceful way, the annulment of the Los Chocoyos license and the immediate departure of the mining company.” - Press release Maya Sipakapense Council, January 14, 2014

In a political action intended to draw attention to the December legal complaint, thousands of protesters gathered on January 14 to express their opposition to Goldcorp's newest project. Community members from surrounding departments and municipalities, many of whom also oppose Goldcorp projects in their territory, joined the Sipakapense people, to form a peaceful march of an estimated 5,000 people. During the course of the day, a worker was taken into custody by those gathered as a pressure tactic. The police responded by apprehending two protesters. Shortly after, those captured on both sides were released.

Protesters in Pie de la Cuesta demand the suspension
 of Goldcorp's Los Chocoyos mine (Photo CPO)

Protests and marches are often considered a “last resort” by communities that have attempted for years to express their opposition to projects through legal actions and community referenda without results. One reason why protest has become so costly in Guatemala is that community leaders and human rights defenders at the forefront of movements in defense of territory are often slapped with unfounded legal suites filed by companies or their associates with the purpose of undermining and criminalizing social movements.

Not surprisingly, less than a month after the January march, 13 legal cases were filed in San Marcos against community members from Sipakapa for alleged criminal activities carried out on they day of the January 14 protest. The 13 community members include seven people from Pie de la Cuesta, the location of the Los Chocoyos project, the January 14 protest, as well as home to numerous members of the Maya Sipakapense Council. For many, the accusations come as a complete surprise, as they were in the neighboring municipality of San Miguel Ixtahuacán holding a press conference on the day of the protest.

As Goldcorp continues to expand, so does community opposition and increased social conflict. Tahoe Resources, a company made up of 40% Goldcorp investment shares and that has structured its management team around ex-Goldcorp employees, most importantly former Glamis Gold CEO Kevin McArthur, is unsurprisingly following in Goldcorp's shameful footsteps. Since Tahoe began the development of its Escobal silver mine in the department of Santa Rosa in southeastern Guatemala, the communities surrounding the project have experienced conflict, violence and massive criminalization of peaceful protest.

Santa Rosa de Lima No se vende - protest on February 14
against Tahoe Resources voluntary royalties (Photo Parlamento Xinca)

Tahoe Resources has brushed off community opposition by claiming that protesters are shipped in from neighboring municipalities who are unaffected by the silver project. The case of Sipakapa and the fact that Tahoe and Goldcorp mining concessions extend into the nearby municipalities of Jalapa, Santa Rosa de Lima and Nueva Santa Rosa, Casillas, Jutiapa and Mataquesquintla, clearly demonstrate that Tahoe will not stop at the Escobal mine. Sipakapa serves as an example that community opposition, despite setback and division, will not stop either.

With information from Breaking the Silence Network

Communities denounce forced labor in San Miguel Ixtahuacán

CALAS and Plurijul denounce mayor of San Miguel Ixtahuacán
Photo: Breaking the Silence

Press Conference Communiqué

Article 4 of the political constitution of the Republic of Guatemala establishes that no person can be subjected to servitude or any other condition which undermines their dignity.

On January 8, 2014, five communities of San Miguel Ixtahuacán, department of San Marcos, where the Marlin Mine (Goldcorp Inc.) operates, presented a complaint against Ovidio Joel Domingo Bámaca, Mayor of San Miguel Ixtahuacán, for the crime of subjecting citizens to involuntary servitude according to article 202 of the criminal code. At the end of January, the Guatemalan Supreme Court of Justice transferred the legal process to the Joint Chamber the Appeals Court of San Marcos.

The Chamber will appoint a judge to resolve whether the complaint put forward constitutes a crime that has been committed, and that is hasn’t been submitted for spurious, political or illegitimate reasons. It will then be sent to be investigated by the Public Prosecutor’s Office in San Marcos.

When a person is obliged to do something against his or her will, the crime of servitude is being committed. This offense is punishable by 10 years in prison. It is a public offense, and therefore, the Appeals Court Judge is required to officially forward the complaint to the Prosecutor’s Office of San Marcos.

The Municipal Mayor is also violating Article 6 of the American Convention on Human Rights of the Organizations of American States (OAS) which prohibits absolute and irrevocable prohibition of slavery, servitude and forced labor.

The five communities of Ágel, San Antonio de los Altos, San José Nueva Esperanza, San José Ixcaniche, and Siete Platos of San Miguel Ixtahuacán, San Marcos, are beneficiaries of the precautionary measures ordered by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights – CIDH – on May 20, 2010, which require guaranteed potable water, water for domestic use and water safe for irrigation, in particular water not contaminated by the Marlin Mine operations. However, we are being forced to work without pay to have access to the precautionary measures.

The accused mayor, Ovidio Joel Domingo Bámaca, is forcing the five communities to:

1. Pay for the right to have running water,

2. Work for free to build the infrastructure for the water projects,

3. Give, for free, natural resources from our communal territories to make the construction materials,

4. Pay for the right of way to the owners of the land where the infrastructure for the water projects will be built,

5. Provide free free labor in the construction, operation and maintenance of infrastructure of the water projects in our communities.

Guatemala, February 6, 2014.

Plurijur, Maya Sipacapense Council, FREDEMI, CALAS

Translation by Breaking the Silence.

Communities in Totonicapán and Quetzaltenango hold community referenda on mining

"The Council of Ancestral Authorities of the 31 communities of Momostenango welcomes you to the good faith community consultation" (All Photos: NISGUA)

On Sunday September 1, the municipality of Momostenango held the third community consultation in the department of Totonicapán. In all three referenda in Totonicapán, as well as two additional referenda in the department of Quetzaltenango, community members overwhelmingly rejected mining projects in their territories.

In Momostenango, 51,667 people, 99.88%, voted No to mining

While there are no mining projects currently operating in Totonicapán, there are 17 concessions for mineral exploration held by Entre Mares and Montana Exploradora, Guatemalan subsidiaries of Canada's Goldcorp Inc. Goldcorp currently owns and operates the Marlin Mine, an open pit gold mine, which has been the source of human rights abuses and tension over lack of respect for indigenous rights, as well as negative impacts on clean water supplies and public health. Goldcorp also holds 40% of shares in Tahoe Resources' controversial Escobal silver mine in San Rafael Las Flores, Santa Rosa.

Two boys show off their inked thumbs - a sign of their participation in the referenda

Since 2005, nearly a million people in more than 78 municipalities across Guatemala have held community referenda on large-scale development projects.

Despite a clear mandate, neither the government nor the companies have respected community decisions. In response to this systematic and historic exclusion of indigenous people from decision-making processes, the Western Peoples' Council (CPO) recently filed a petition with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) for failure to consult with indigenous peoples on projects and policy decisions that impact their territories. 

During a September 3 press conference, Lolita Chávez, member of the CPO in representation of the K'iche' Peoples' Council, explained indigenous peoples' opposition to the large-scale development model imposed by the government: “The government says that we are an obstacle to development, but we believe that your laws and your state are an impediment to the path of our people.”

Read NISGUA's press release: Guatemalan Indigenous Organizations File Complaint over Mining Law with Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Organizaciones indígenas guatemaltecas denuncian al estado por la ley minera ante la CIDH

Fuente: Consejo del Pueblo Maya de Occidente (CPO) – Red en Solidaridad con el Pueblo de Guatemala (NISGUA) – Alerta Minera Canadá – Centro para el Derecho Ambiental Internacional (CIEL)



(Ciudad de Guatemala/Ottawa/Washington) Martes, el Consejo del Pueblo Maya de Occidente (CPO) de Guatemala presentó una demanda ante la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (CIDH), alegando que se aprobó la ley minera sin consulta previa tal como se requiere bajo la ley nacional e internacional. El CPO recurre a la CIDH debido a que ha agotado todos los canales disponibles a nivel nacional para poner alto a las violaciones resultando a raíz de la actual ley minera.

El CPO cuestionó la constitucionalidad de la ley minera de 1997 por primera vez en una demanda interpuesta ante la Corte de Constitucionalidad de Guatemala en julio de 2012. Sin embargo, en marzo de 2013, la Corte de Constitucionalidad falló a favor de la vigencia de la ley minera, contraviniendo las obligaciones legales que tiene Guatemala de consultar la población indígena antes de aprobar políticas que podrían afectar sus territorios de forma significativa.

“Creemos que la decisión de la Corte de Constitucionalidad es ilegal y contradictoria, dado que la misma corte decretó en 2011 que la consulta es un derecho constitucional de los pueblos indígenas de Guatemala. La ley de minería no fue consultado con los pueblos indígenas a pesar que es una medida legislativa susceptible de afectar nuestra forma de vida y que el estado de Guatemala se comprometió de cumplir al ratificar instrumentos internacional de derechos colectivos de pueblos indígenas como el convenio 169”, dijo Lucia Xiloj, abogada y miembro del equipo legal del CPO.


Con más de 360 licencias otorgadas y más de 600 pendientes, el sector minero en Guatemala ha dado lugar al aumento del conflicto y la violencia en diversas partes del país. Al raíz de estos conflictos está la falta de respeto para el consentimiento libre, previo e informado de las comunidades afectadas por los proyectos y las políticas mineras.

Desde 2005, casi un millón de personas han votado en contra de la minería en sus territorios en 78 consultas comunitarias realizadas en el país. Además, una encuesta libre publicada en enero de 2013 demostró que 66% de guatemaltecos rechazan la actividad minera. Sin embargo, ni el gobierno ni las empresas mineras han respetado las decisiones comunitarias; al contrario, se ha intensificado la represión contra quienes se oponen a la minería.

“El conflicto, que tiene a su raíz la violación del derecho a la consulta, ha resultado en ataques violentos y muertos, y la criminalización y persecución de líderes comunitarios”,  dijo Lolita Chávez, miembro del CPO y firmante de la denuncia ante la CIDH.



Bajo el Acuerdo Sobre Identidad y Derechos de los Pueblos Indígenas en los Acuerdos de Paz de Guatemala, la Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos, el Convenio No. 169 de la Organización Internacional del Trabajo, y la Declaración de las Naciones Unidas sobre los Derechos de los Pueblos Indígenas, Guatemala está obligada a respetar el derecho de los pueblos indígenas al consentimiento libre, previo e informado sobre cualquier proyecto que podría impactarles de una forma adversa, y de consultarlos antes de aprobar leyes o iniciativas administrativas que afectarían sus derechos. 

“Una respuesta favorable de la Comisión Interamericana a este caso es de gran importancia, dado que la actual ley minera ha permitido que empresas mineras, de los Estados Unidos y Canadá en particular, explotan los territorios indígenas con una falta de consideración total para la toma de decisiones de los pueblos indígenas sobre sus territorios y recursos naturales”, dijo Kris Genovese, abogada del Centro para el Derecho Ambiental Internacional en Washington D.C.

El Consejo del Pueblo Maya del Occidente es una coalición de autoridades indígenas e instituciones de siete departamentos de Guatemala. La denuncia puesto ante la CIDH tiene 32 firmantes en representación de 8 pueblos indígenas que conforman el Consejo del Pueblo Maya del Occidente. Cada firmante fue elegido durante asambleas comunitarias llevado a cabo antes de sentar la denuncia.

Contactos
Ellen Moore, NISGUA, ellen(at)nisgua.org, (510) 868-0612
Jen Moore, MiningWatch Canada, jen(at)miningwatch.ca, (613) 569-3439
Amanda Kistler, Centro para el Derecho Ambiental Internacional, akistler(at)ciel.org, (202) 742-5832

Antecedentes

En mayo, se mandó el ejército a las comunidades indígenas y no-indígenas por el proyecto Escobal de Tahoe Resources, un proyecto minero de plata al sur de la Ciudad de Guatemala, después de un aumento en la violencia en la zona, lo que incluyó el disparar por parte del equipo de seguridad de la mina en contra de un grupo manifestando de forma pacífica en frente del proyecto. El gerente de seguridad de la empresa y su asesor están actualmente enjuiciados y esperando una audiencia sobre su presunto involucramiento en ordenar y después encubrir evidencia sobre el ataque.

Tahoe Resources es un empresa estrechamente relacionado a la Goldcorp, la cual vendió el proyecto Escobal a Tahoe en 2010 y que actualmente posee 40% de sus acciones y con múltiples puestos en su junta directiva. La mina Marlin de Goldcorp en el noroeste de Guatemala ha sido una fuente de tensiones continuas por falta de respeto a los derechos y las tierras indígenas, y por impactos sobre las fuentes de agua y la salud pública.

Durante casi un año y medio, los pobladores en La Puya, inmediatamente al norte de la Ciudad de Guatemala, han sostenido un bloqueo pacífico en la entrada del proyecto minero Tambor. Este proyecto se encuentra actualmente en manos de Kappes Cassidy & Associates, que adquirió el proyecto de Radius Gold, con sede en Vancouver, en agosto de 2012, después del atento contra de Yolanda Oquelí. Quienes se oponen al proyecto han sufrido amenazas repetidas por parte de los empleados de la empresa durante los últimos diez meses, a pesar de haber entrado en un diálogo de alto nivel con el gobierno en junio.

En agosto, Derechos en Acción reportó que un grupo de mujeres en la municipalidad de El Estor están enfrentando intimidación y hostigamiento por su participación en llevar tres demandas en contra de Hudbay Minerals, con sede en Toronto. Las demandas refieren a la violación sexual de un grupo de once mujeres durante un desalojo forzoso en 2007, y el asesinato a tiros en 2009 de Adolfo Ich Chamán y paralisis de German Choc. Se está litigando el caso en una corte de la provincia de Ontario, Canadá y marcan la primera vez que las cortes canadienses admiten un caso en contra de una empresa matriz por presuntos abusos por parte de su empresa filial en la extranjera.

Comunicado del CPO: El Consejo de los Pueblos Mayas y Xinca, denuncian al estado de Guatemala ante la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos


Porque la Corte de Constitucionalidad, mediante sentencia emitida el 28 de febrero de 2013, resolvió sin lugar la acción de inconstitucionalidad planteada en contra de la Ley de Minería el 12 de marzo de 2012.



Dicha sentencia incurrió al Estado de Guatemala en responsabilidad internacional al dejar vigente la Ley de Minería; no obstante la obligación internacional del Estado de garantizar el ejercicio efectivo de nuestros derechos políticos de participación, consulta y consentimiento en materia legislativa.



Los derechos humanos colectivos e individuales que han sido violentados por el Estado de Guatemala incluyen:



a. Derechos políticos ―derechos de participación, consulta y consentimiento―, reconocidos en el artículo 23.1.a de la Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos (la Convención).


b. Derecho de igualdad ante la ley, reconocido en el artículo 24 de la Convención.


c. Derecho a las garantías judiciales y protección judicial ―derecho de acceso a la justicia―, reconocido en los artículos 8.1 y 25.1 de la Convención. En relación con los artículos 1.1 y 2 de la Convención.



Con base en la descripción de hechos y la enunciación de los derechos violentados, ante la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos solicitamos:



a. Que proceda al análisis de nuestro caso y que requiera al Estado de Guatemala las observaciones pertinentes.


b. Que emita el respectivo informe de admisibilidad.


c. Que determine la responsabilidad del Estado de Guatemala como violador de los artículos 23.1.a, 24, 8.1 y 25.1, en relación con los artículos 1.1 y 2 de la Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos, a través de la emisión de un informe de fondo.

Guatemalan Indigenous Organizations File Complaint over Mining Law with Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Sources: Western Peoples' Council (CPO) - Network in Solidarity with the People of Guatemala (NISGUA) - MiningWatch Canada – Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL)

(Guatemala City/Ottawa/Washington) Tuesday, Guatemala's Western Peoples' Council of Mayan organizations (CPO) filed a petition with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) alleging that the country’s mining law was approved without their prior consultation as required under both national and international law. The IACHR is the last resort for the CPO, which has exhausted all domestic recourse to halt violations as a result of current mining legislation.



The CPO first challenged the constitutionality of the 1997 Mining Law in a July 2012 suit filed with Guatemala’s Constitutional Court. In March 2013, however, the Constitutional Court upheld the mining law, contradicting Guatemala's legal obligations to consult with indigenous peoples before the approval of policies that will significantly impact their territories.

“We believe that Constitutional Court’s decision is illegal and contradictory, given that the same court ruled in 2011 that consultation is a constitutional right of indigenous peoples in Guatemala. Indigenous peoples were not consulted on the Mining Law despite its implications for our way of life and the state’s commitment to respect the collective rights of indigenous people under international legal instruments such as the International Labour Organization’s Convention 169,” said Lucia Xiloj, attorney and member of the CPO legal team.



With over 360 mining licenses issued and more than 600 pending, Guatemala’s mining sector has been in the spotlight for increasing conflict and violence across the country. At the root of these conflicts is the lack of respect for free, prior and informed consent of affected communities at the project and policy level.



Nearly a million people have voted against mining on their territories in 78 community referenda held throughout Guatemala since 2005. A public opinion survey published in January 2013 further demonstrated that some 66% of Guatemalans are opposed to mining. Nonetheless, neither the government nor the mining companies have respected community decisions; instead repression against those opposed to mining has intensified.

“The conflict, which has at its root the violation of the right to consultation, has resulted in targeted attacks and death, as well as the criminalization and persecution of community leaders,” said Lolita Chavez, member of the CPO and a signatory on the IACHR complaint.



According to the Agreement on Identity and Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Guatemala’s Peace Accords, the American Convention on Human Rights, the International Labour Organization Convention No. 169 and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Guatemala is obliged to respect the right of indigenous peoples to free, prior and informed consent for any project that could adversely impact them, and to consult with them before passing laws or administrative initiatives that would affect their rights.
 


“A favorable response from the Inter-American Commission on this case is vitally important, given that the current mining law has allowed Canadian and U.S. mining companies in particular to exploit indigenous territories with complete disregard for indigenous peoples' decision-making processes regarding their lands and resources,” said Kris Genovese, Senior Attorney with the Center for International Environmental Law in Washington D.C.



The Western People’s Council is a coalition of indigenous authorities and institutions from seven departments of Guatemala. The complaint filed in the IACHR has 32 signatories representing 8 indigenous groups that make up the Western Peoples’ Council. Each signatory was elected during community assemblies carried out during the weeks leading up to the filing.
 


Contacts

• Ellen Moore, NISGUA, ellen(at)nisgua.org, (510) 868-0612
• Jen Moore, MiningWatch Canada, jen(at)miningwatch.ca, (613) 569-3439 
• Amanda Kistler, Center for International Environmental Law, akistler(at)ciel.org, (202) 742-5832

Background 



In May, the military was sent into indigenous and non-indigenous communities in the area of Tahoe Resources’ Escobal silver project south of Guatemala City, following increased violence in the region, including a shooting against protesters demonstrating peacefully outside the mine site. The company’s head of security and his advisor are currently awaiting trial for their alleged involvement in ordering and then covering up evidence of the attack.



Tahoe Resources is a spin-off from Goldcorp, which sold the Escobal project to Tahoe in 2010 and which now holds 40% of Tahoe’s shares and multiple positions on its board of directors. Goldcorp’s Marlin mine in the northwestern highlands of Guatemala has been the source of continuing tensions over lack of respect for indigenous rights and land, and impacts on water supplies and public health.



For nearly a year and a half, community members in La Puya, just north of Guatemala City, have been peacefully blocking entry to the Tambor mine project currently in the hands of Kappes Cassidy & Associates, which took over the project from Vancouver-based Radius Gold in August 2012 following the shooting of Yolanda Oquelí. Community members opposing the project have faced repeated threats from company workers during the last ten months, despite entering into a high-level dialogue with the government in June.



In August, Rights Action reported that female plaintiffs are facing intimidation and harassment for having brought three lawsuits against Toronto-based Hudbay Minerals regarding the gang rape of a group of women during a forced eviction in 2007 and shootings in 2009 in the eastern municipality of El Estor. The lawsuits are taking place in an Ontario court and mark the first time that alleged human rights abuses regarding a foreign-owned subsidiary have been admitted against a parent company in Canada.


CPO Communiqué: The Council of Maya and Xinca Peoples Denounces the Guatemala State in the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

On February 28, 2013, the Guatemalan Constitutional Court dismissed the Council’s challenge of unconstitutionality filed against the mining law on March 12, 2012. 

As a result of leaving the current Mining Law in force, the State of Guatemala violates its responsibilities under international law, under which it is obliged to guarantee the effective exercise of our rights to political participation, consultation and consent regarding such legislation.

The collective and individual human rights that have been violated by the State of Guatemala are:

a.    Political Rights – the rights to participation, consultation and consent as recognized in article 23.1 of the American Convention on Human Rights (The Convention).
b.    Right to equality under the law as recognized in article 24 of the Convention.
c.    Right to legal guarantees and judicial protection – right to access to justice – as per articles 8.1 and 25.1 of the Convention, in relation to articles 1.1 and 2 of the Convention.

Based on the description of the facts and declaration of the rights that have been violated; we request that the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights:

a.    Proceed with the analysis of our case and request the relevant observations from the state of Guatemala;
b.    Emit the pertinent report regarding admissibility of the case;
c.    Determine the responsibility of the state of Guatemala for violation of articles 23.1.a., 24, 8.1, and 25.1, related to articles 1.1 y 2 of the Convention through the elaboration of an in-depth report.

Gains for communities defending life and territory as mining takes a hit in Guatemala

On July 22, a Canadian court ruled that Hudbay Minerals will stand trial in Canada for violence, including murder and rape, carried out by employees of its former Guatemalan subsidiary, Compañía Guatemalteca de Níquel S.A. (CGN). The struggle to hold this Canadian mining company responsible for human rights abuses committed abroad began in 2010 when Angelica Choc initiated a lawsuit for the murder of her husband, community leader Adolfo Ich Chamán, by private security guards contracted by CGN.

Today, Hudbay is set to stand trial not only for the murder of Ich Chamán, but also in the shooting of German Chub, and the 2007 gang rape of 11 women by mining security personnel. Angelica Choc, widow of Adolfo Ich, reacted to the court's decision saying, “Today is a great day for me and all others who brought this lawsuit…. It means everything to us that we can now stand up to Hudbay in Canadian courts to seek justice for what happened to us.”[1]

Angelica Choc filed her case against HudbayMinerals Inc. in December 2010
for the murder of her husband Adolfo Ich Chamán. Photo: Graham Hunt

This historic decision marks the first time a Canadian court will hear a case against a Canadian company for human rights abuses committed at a foreign mine site. It undoubtedly sets a strong precedent for future cases of abuses committed by North American companies operating abroad. In the words of Murray Klippenstein, lawyer for the 13 plaintiffs; “As a result of this ruling, Canadian mining corporations can no longer hide behind their legal corporate structure to abdicate responsibility for human rights abuses that take place at foreign mines under their control at various locations throughout the world.”[2] Read the full press release here or visit the Choc v. Hudbay website for more information.

On the heels of the effective suspension of Tahoe Resources' exploitation license for the Escobal silver mine, Canadian mining giant, Goldcorp, which is also a 40% shareholder in Tahoe's project, announced the indefinite suspension of its Cerro Blanco gold mine located close to the Guatemala, El Salvador border in the department of Jutiapa. Goldcorp contends that the project was put on hold due to falling metal prices, but that the company is not contemplating its permanent closure.[3]

Earlier this year, members of Breaking the Silence, MiningWatch, the Center for International Environmental Law and other North American organizations traveled to Asunción Mitla, the site of the Cerro Blanco mine, as part of a delegation to investigate the impacts of gold mining on water sources in El Salvador. The delegation reported on their visit to Asunción Mita where they heard firsthand from community representatives about nearby hot springs threatening the project and also community concerns related to the possible environmental impacts of the mine, especially on El Salvadoran water sources. 

The Cerro Blanco mine has been the subject of international controversy due to its
potential negative environmental impact on both Guatemalan and El Salvadoran territories.
Photo: http://www.stopesmining.org

During an August 6 press conference the MadreSelva Collective responded to Goldcorp's announcement stating that closure of Cerro Blanco was the result of “poor planning since the project's beginning, the bravado of mining companies, and the negligence, incapacity and corruption of a docile Guatemalan government...”[4] It goes on to point out numerous deficiencies in the environmental impact assessment, including a lack of analysis and oversight by the Ministry of Energy and Mines and Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of the likely impacts of subterranean water high in temperature and arsenic. MadreSelva joins Guatemalan and Salvadoran communities and organizations in calling for the permanent suspension of the mine that includes a detailed and fully funded closure plan in place to address the outstanding negative environmental impacts of the project. 


While we have yet to see the outcome of the forthcoming trials against Hudbay Minerals Inc., the  announcement that the company will stand trial in Canada along with the effective suspension of Tahoe Resources' Escobal silver mine and Goldcorp's Cerro Blanco gold mine are huge gains for communities defending their life and territory. Furthermore, it is certain these historic advances will serve as examples for future struggles in defense of life and against the extractive mining industry in Guatemala.

---

[1] Press Advisory: Ontario court rules that lawsuits against Hudbay Minerals regarding shootings, murder and gang-rape at its former mine in Guatemala can proceed to trial in Canada. http://www.chocversushudbay.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/PRESS-ADVISORY-Ontario-Court-rules-claim-can-proceed-to-trial.pdf

[2] idem

 Read the full press release here or visit the Choc v. Hudbay website. 

[3] “Goldcorp takes $1.8bn hit on Mexican Peñasquito mine.” http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/23b3a128-f535-11e2-b4f8-00144feabdc0.html

[4] “La Mina Cerro Blanco no se suspende por la baja del precio del oro". Comunicado, Colectivo MadreSelva. http://www.nisgua.org/Comunicado_cierre_Mina_Cerro_Blanco_60813.pdf